I'm guessing only after a quantifier ..

L.

Esther-Kristin Lather wrote:
I guess my problem is solved...
;-)

(but one question remains in my head: So I can use the ? for non-greedy 
search only after a quantifier? Or also if I group something with round 
brackets?)

Jonathan Gordon wrote:
  
............................................________........................ 

....................................,.-‘”...................``~.,.................. 

.............................,.-”...................................“-.,............ 

.........................,/...............................................”:,........ 

.....................,?......................................................\,..... 

.................../...........................................................,}.... 

................./......................................................,:`^`..}.... 

.............../...................................................,:”........./..... 

..............?.....__.........................................:`.........../..... 

............./__.(.....“~-,_..............................,:`........../........ 

.........../(_....”~,_........“~,_....................,:`........_/........... 

..........{.._$;_......”=,_.......“-,_.......,.-~-,},.~”;/....}...........
...........((.....*~_.......”=-._......“;,,./`..../”............../............ 

...,,,___.\`~,......“~.,....................`.....}............../............. 

............(....`=-,,.......`........................(......;_,,-”............... 

............/.`~,......`-...............................\....../\................... 

.............\`~.*-,.....................................|,./.....\,__........... 

,,_..........}.>-._\...................................|..............`=~-,.... 

.....`=~-,_\_......`\,.................................\........................ 

...................`=~-,,.\,...............................\....................... 

................................`:,,...........................`\..............__.. 

.....................................`=-,...................,%`>--==``....... 

........................................_\..........._,-%.......`\............... 

...................................,<`.._|_,-&``................`\..............
lieven sterck wrote:
  
    
if there wasn't an ocean separating us, I would smack you!!!
O:-)
L.

Thomas Abeel wrote:
    
      
I would paste it in Word, replace the spaces with a tabs, select the 
whole thing, copy it and paste it in Excel. Then select the column you need.

That's what I call KIS. No need to mess around with Perl

lieven sterck wrote:
  
      
        
aaahh,  8-)  , the many ways of PERL !!!

Sebastian Proost wrote:
    
        
          
Esther-Kristin Lather schreef:
  
      
          
            
Hi!

How can I make this Regex greedy?

my ($seq) = ($var =~m/^(.*_{0,1}\d+)\s.*/);

if $var is "ara_prot.tfa_3154 | AT1G26170.1 | no family",
I want to cut after the first whitespace
so that $seq becomes be "ara_prot.tfa_3154" and not "ara_prot.tfa_3154 | 
AT1G26170.1".

I don't know where/ how to include the ? for non-greedy search. I would 
want to do it with round brackets, but that violates the round brackets 
I already use for getting a part of the string, no?

Thanks for any suggestions!
Esther.
_______________________________________________
Binari Implicitly Neglects All Recursive Iterations
https://maillist.psb.ugent.be/mailman/listinfo/binari

  
    
        
            
              
use split ;)

  
      
          
            
-- 
==============================================================
Lieven Sterck, PhD

Tel:+32 (0)9 3313821                       Fax:+32 (0)9 3313809
VIB Department of Plant Systems Biology, UGent
Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Genomics Division
Technologiepark 927,         B-9052 Gent,             Belgium
Email: lieven.sterck@psb.vib-ugent.be
Website: http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be

==============================================================
"Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything 
that's even remotely true!" H. Simpson


------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Binari Implicitly Neglects All Recursive Iterations
https://maillist.psb.ugent.be/mailman/listinfo/binari
    
        
          
_______________________________________________
Binari Implicitly Neglects All Recursive Iterations
https://maillist.psb.ugent.be/mailman/listinfo/binari
  
      
        
-- 
==============================================================
Lieven Sterck, PhD

Tel:+32 (0)9 3313821                       Fax:+32 (0)9 3313809
VIB Department of Plant Systems Biology, UGent
Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Genomics Division
Technologiepark 927,         B-9052 Gent,             Belgium
Email: lieven.sterck@psb.vib-ugent.be
Website: http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be

==============================================================
"Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything 
that's even remotely true!" H. Simpson
  
------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Binari Implicitly Neglects All Recursive Iterations
https://maillist.psb.ugent.be/mailman/listinfo/binari
  
    
      
  
    


_______________________________________________
Binari Implicitly Neglects All Recursive Iterations
https://maillist.psb.ugent.be/mailman/listinfo/binari
  

-- 
==============================================================
Lieven Sterck, PhD

Tel:+32 (0)9 3313821                       Fax:+32 (0)9 3313809
VIB Department of Plant Systems Biology, UGent
Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Genomics Division
Technologiepark 927,         B-9052 Gent,             Belgium
Email: lieven.sterck@psb.vib-ugent.be
Website: http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be

==============================================================
"Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything 
that's even remotely true!" H. Simpson