http://tweakers.net/nieuws/61137/googles-chrome-os-gaat-strijd-met-windows-a... (dutch, though I'm sure there's an english article about this somewhere ;-)) Sofie -- Sofie Van Landeghem PhD Student VIB Department of Plant Systems Biology, Ghent University Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Genomics Technologiepark 927, 9052 Gent, BELGIUM Tel: +32 (0)9 331 36 95 fax:+32 (0)9 3313809 Website: http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be
Sofie Van Landeghem wrote:
http://tweakers.net/nieuws/61137/googles-chrome-os-gaat-strijd-met-windows-a... (dutch, though I'm sure there's an english article about this somewhere ;-))
Sofie
from the bbc website: "The news could also be a blow to the open source Linux operating system, which had taken an early lead on netbooks, but then lost out to Microsoft's elderly Windows XP." I'm slightly confused: if google chrome is linux-based (which is said everywhere but the bbc-website), how can it be a blow to linux? :/ :p Anyway, it would've been nice if they developed something completely different, instead of making just another linux distro (which it will turn out to be I think). -- ================================================================== Michiel Van Bel PhD student Tel:+32 (0)9 331 36 95 fax:+32 (0)9 3313809 VIB Department of Plant Systems Biology, Ghent University Technologiepark 927, 9052 Gent, BELGIUM mibel@psb.vib-ugent.be http://www.psb.vib-ugent.be ==================================================================
Sebastian Proost wrote:
Michiel Van Bel schreef:
Sofie Van Landeghem wrote:
http://tweakers.net/nieuws/61137/googles-chrome-os-gaat-strijd-met-windows-a... (dutch, though I'm sure there's an english article about this somewhere ;-))
Sofie
from the bbc website: "The news could also be a blow to the open source Linux operating system, which had taken an early lead on netbooks, but then lost out to Microsoft's elderly Windows XP."
I'm slightly confused: if google chrome is linux-based (which is said everywhere but the bbc-website), how can it be a blow to linux? :/ :p Anyway, it would've been nice if they developed something completely different, instead of making just another linux distro (which it will turn out to be I think).
http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/07/five-things-googles-chrome-os-will-do...
Actually if they can actually pull all these things off, I would be very happy to drop windows for their OS on my eeepc.
me 2! Sofie
Sofie Van Landeghem schreef:
Sebastian Proost wrote:
Michiel Van Bel schreef:
Sofie Van Landeghem wrote:
http://tweakers.net/nieuws/61137/googles-chrome-os-gaat-strijd-met-windows-a... (dutch, though I'm sure there's an english article about this somewhere ;-))
Sofie
from the bbc website: "The news could also be a blow to the open source Linux operating system, which had taken an early lead on netbooks, but then lost out to Microsoft's elderly Windows XP."
I'm slightly confused: if google chrome is linux-based (which is said everywhere but the bbc-website), how can it be a blow to linux? :/ :p Anyway, it would've been nice if they developed something completely different, instead of making just another linux distro (which it will turn out to be I think).
http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/07/five-things-googles-chrome-os-will-do...
Actually if they can actually pull all these things off, I would be very happy to drop windows for their OS on my eeepc.
me 2!
So, actually, the only thing that Google OS is doing better that the existing linux distro's is marketing? Cost: Linux is free Speed: All the speed eating sits in the desktop environment. Use a linux one that isn't too bloated, or use KDE or Gnome without the eye candy and 3D effects and you have lightning speed. Compatibility: Right, most drivers are designed for Windows. So now they will suddenly exist for Google OS? I suppose the drivers Google OS will support out of the box, will be the ones that linux supports out of the box as well, as they will be using the linux kernel and modules. Portabilty: If you're using Google docs now from any platform, it'll be available everywhere. Same if you commit to an SVN. Nothing changes there. Except that you might want to use Chrome for linux instead of Firefox once its comes out. New Apps: Awesome VLC player existed first for linux. Still does. For music Amarok is the best player around and mplayer, smplayer, etc... are there as well. All one by one great media players for linux. Further, I suppose there will be a 'Google Store' as they're doing for Android now, that's just an implementation of package manager (yum, apt, rpm, ...) So yeah... just another linux distro... except without the nerdy ring of 'linux' to it, but the cool sound of Google. T. -- ================================================================== Thomas Van Parys Tel:+32 (0)9 331 36 95 fax:+32 (0)9 3313809 VIB Department of Plant Systems Biology, Ghent University Technologiepark 927, 9052 Gent, BELGIUM thomas.vanparys@psb.vib-ugent.be http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be ==================================================================
Thomas Van Parys wrote:
Sofie Van Landeghem schreef:
Sebastian Proost wrote:
Michiel Van Bel schreef:
Sofie Van Landeghem wrote:
http://tweakers.net/nieuws/61137/googles-chrome-os-gaat-strijd-met-windows-a... (dutch, though I'm sure there's an english article about this somewhere ;-))
Sofie
from the bbc website: "The news could also be a blow to the open source Linux operating system, which had taken an early lead on netbooks, but then lost out to Microsoft's elderly Windows XP."
I'm slightly confused: if google chrome is linux-based (which is said everywhere but the bbc-website), how can it be a blow to linux? :/ :p Anyway, it would've been nice if they developed something completely different, instead of making just another linux distro (which it will turn out to be I think).
http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/07/five-things-googles-chrome-os-will-do...
Actually if they can actually pull all these things off, I would be very happy to drop windows for their OS on my eeepc.
me 2!
So, actually, the only thing that Google OS is doing better that the existing linux distro's is marketing?
Cost: Linux is free
Speed: All the speed eating sits in the desktop environment. Use a linux one that isn't too bloated, or use KDE or Gnome without the eye candy and 3D effects and you have lightning speed.
Compatibility: Right, most drivers are designed for Windows. So now they will suddenly exist for Google OS? Quite possibly. Because google is good at marketing :p I suppose the drivers Google OS will support out of the box, will be the ones that linux supports out of the box as well, as they will be using the linux kernel and modules.
Portabilty: If you're using Google docs now from any platform, it'll be available everywhere. Same if you commit to an SVN. Nothing changes there. Except that you might want to use Chrome for linux instead of Firefox once its comes out.
New Apps: Awesome VLC player existed first for linux. Still does. For music Amarok is the best player around and mplayer, smplayer, etc... are there as well. All one by one great media players for linux.
Further, I suppose there will be a 'Google Store' as they're doing for Android now, that's just an implementation of package manager (yum, apt, rpm, ...)
So yeah... just another linux distro... except without the nerdy ring of 'linux' to it, but the cool sound of Google.
T.
-- Sofie Van Landeghem PhD Student VIB Department of Plant Systems Biology, Ghent University Bioinformatics and Evolutionary Genomics Technologiepark 927, 9052 Gent, BELGIUM Tel: +32 (0)9 331 36 95 fax:+32 (0)9 3313809 Website: http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be
Sofie Van Landeghem schreef:
Thomas Van Parys wrote:
Sofie Van Landeghem schreef:
Sebastian Proost wrote:
Michiel Van Bel schreef:
Sofie Van Landeghem wrote:
http://tweakers.net/nieuws/61137/googles-chrome-os-gaat-strijd-met-windows-a... (dutch, though I'm sure there's an english article about this somewhere ;-))
Sofie
from the bbc website: "The news could also be a blow to the open source Linux operating system, which had taken an early lead on netbooks, but then lost out to Microsoft's elderly Windows XP."
I'm slightly confused: if google chrome is linux-based (which is said everywhere but the bbc-website), how can it be a blow to linux? :/ :p Anyway, it would've been nice if they developed something completely different, instead of making just another linux distro (which it will turn out to be I think).
http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/07/five-things-googles-chrome-os-will-do...
Actually if they can actually pull all these things off, I would be very happy to drop windows for their OS on my eeepc.
me 2!
So, actually, the only thing that Google OS is doing better that the existing linux distro's is marketing?
Cost: Linux is free
Speed: All the speed eating sits in the desktop environment. Use a linux one that isn't too bloated, or use KDE or Gnome without the eye candy and 3D effects and you have lightning speed.
Compatibility: Right, most drivers are designed for Windows. So now they will suddenly exist for Google OS? Quite possibly. Because google is good at marketing :p
This indeed looks like the main advantage. If Google indeed has the power to convince hardware manufacturers to create drivers for "Google OS", they are actually writing linux drivers. T.
I suppose the drivers Google OS will support out of the box, will be the ones that linux supports out of the box as well, as they will be using the linux kernel and modules.
Portabilty: If you're using Google docs now from any platform, it'll be available everywhere. Same if you commit to an SVN. Nothing changes there. Except that you might want to use Chrome for linux instead of Firefox once its comes out.
New Apps: Awesome VLC player existed first for linux. Still does. For music Amarok is the best player around and mplayer, smplayer, etc... are there as well. All one by one great media players for linux.
Further, I suppose there will be a 'Google Store' as they're doing for Android now, that's just an implementation of package manager (yum, apt, rpm, ...)
So yeah... just another linux distro... except without the nerdy ring of 'linux' to it, but the cool sound of Google.
-- ================================================================== Thomas Van Parys Tel:+32 (0)9 331 36 95 fax:+32 (0)9 3313809 VIB Department of Plant Systems Biology, Ghent University Technologiepark 927, 9052 Gent, BELGIUM thomas.vanparys@psb.vib-ugent.be http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be ==================================================================
Hi, "What's next? A Gmail-based operating system?" - Fake Steve Jobs and "People are starting to realize that Google is not their friend, and that all this "free stuff" from Google is not about a) philanthropy, or b) keeping Microsoft honest, but really about c) helping Google gain even more control over what you do on the Internet." Read more here: http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2009/07/lets-all-take-deep-breath-and-get-some... -Kenny On Wed, 8 Jul 2009, Sebastian Proost wrote:
I totally agree that some of their top 5 points are merits of linux and not purely google's OS.
Unfortunately an easy to install linux distro (I've used ubuntu) was, even with a special netbook kernel, somewhat slower then winXP. The battery life, that dropped 30-40% when compared to winXP (I actually timed it, so it's not just an error in the timer of the OS ;) ) (even with all recommended tweaks) Also a normal ubuntu install is quite large (> 3 Gb ) (main SSD is only 4Gb).
Those arguments would tip the scale for me personally in the favor of winXP.
So if they have the manpower to build a linux version without those drawbacks, keeping all the advantages ... gimme gimme ;)
Seb
PS. I consider losing the nerdy ring a disadvantage :-D
Thomas Van Parys schreef:
Sofie Van Landeghem schreef:
Sebastian Proost wrote:
Michiel Van Bel schreef:
Sofie Van Landeghem wrote:
http://tweakers.net/nieuws/61137/googles-chrome-os-gaat-strijd-met-windows-a... (dutch, though I'm sure there's an english article about this somewhere ;-))
Sofie
from the bbc website: "The news could also be a blow to the open source Linux operating system, which had taken an early lead on netbooks, but then lost out to Microsoft's elderly Windows XP."
I'm slightly confused: if google chrome is linux-based (which is said everywhere but the bbc-website), how can it be a blow to linux? :/ :p Anyway, it would've been nice if they developed something completely different, instead of making just another linux distro (which it will turn out to be I think).
http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/07/five-things-googles-chrome-os-will-do...
Actually if they can actually pull all these things off, I would be very happy to drop windows for their OS on my eeepc.
me 2!
So, actually, the only thing that Google OS is doing better that the existing linux distro's is marketing?
Cost: Linux is free
Speed: All the speed eating sits in the desktop environment. Use a linux one that isn't too bloated, or use KDE or Gnome without the eye candy and 3D effects and you have lightning speed.
Compatibility: Right, most drivers are designed for Windows. So now they will suddenly exist for Google OS? I suppose the drivers Google OS will support out of the box, will be the ones that linux supports out of the box as well, as they will be using the linux kernel and modules.
Portabilty: If you're using Google docs now from any platform, it'll be available everywhere. Same if you commit to an SVN. Nothing changes there. Except that you might want to use Chrome for linux instead of Firefox once its comes out.
New Apps: Awesome VLC player existed first for linux. Still does. For music Amarok is the best player around and mplayer, smplayer, etc... are there as well. All one by one great media players for linux.
Further, I suppose there will be a 'Google Store' as they're doing for Android now, that's just an implementation of package manager (yum, apt, rpm, ...)
So yeah... just another linux distro... except without the nerdy ring of 'linux' to it, but the cool sound of Google.
T.
-- ================================================================== Sebastian Proost PhD Student
Tel:+ 32 (0) 9 33 13 822 fax:+32 (0)9 3313809 VIB Department of Plant Systems Biology, Ghent University Technologiepark 927, 9052 Gent, BELGIUM sebastian.proost@psb.vib-ugent.be http://www.psb.ugent.be ================================================================== "If I knew what I was doing, it wouldn't be called research." --Albert Einstein
-- ================================================================== Kenny Billiau Web Developer Tel:+32 (0)9 331 36 95 fax:+32 (0)9 3313809 VIB Department of Plant Systems Biology, Ghent University Technologiepark 927, 9052 Gent, BELGIUM kenny.billiau@ugent.be http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be ================================================================== "The important thing is that you're alive" - Roxanne
participants (5)
-
Kenny Billiau -
Michiel Van Bel -
Sebastian Proost -
Sofie Van Landeghem -
Thomas Van Parys